Dot vs Muse

OpenAI’s background agent vs Meta’s personal agent — two different answers to the same dream.

What a Dot really is

Not a chatbot session. You create a named agent in ChatGPT desktop/web, give it a standing goal, connect the apps it needs, and set what it can do without asking. It then keeps working in the background on its own cloud computer and browser.

Under the hood

Pricing & access

Safety controls

Head-to-head

Aspect OpenAI Dots Muse
LaunchSep 29, 2026Sep 8, 2026
ModelGPT-6 AstraMuse Spark
Runs onOwn cloud computer + browserDedicated Muse Secure VM
Gate for actionsCustom Rules + Auto-reviewSentinel agent approves outbound actions
Where you talk to itChatGPT web/desktop/mobile, Slack, Teams, voice, SMS sooniOS, Android, muse.ai, WhatsApp
StandoutRead-only proactive research, 4,000+ appsDeep Meta ecosystem ties, personal goals/feed/ideas
Price entry$100/mo Pro includedFree tier + paid plans

The table’s core rows come from a launch-day comparison.

The real split

Positioning is the real split: Muse was built for everyday personal use — shopping, travel, emailing — while Dots is pitched at ongoing work and productivity, recurring tasks, research, software and workplace workflows.

Caveat: Meta just blurred that line on Sep 29 too, adding Muse for Small Business with Asana, QuickBooks, Shopify, Stripe, Slack, Notion etc., plus Facebook/Instagram business accounts, with approval required before it publishes, sends or spends.

My take

If you live in ChatGPT/Slack/Teams and want a workhorse for ongoing projects, Dots is aimed at you — if you can stomach $100/mo. If you want a personal agent for life admin + goals that’s free to start and lives in your pocket, that’s Muse’s lane — try it with my invite code.

Try Muse with my invite code →